Post by xyz2900 on Feb 11, 2024 5:01:14 GMT -6
Folha de S.Paulo continues to be prevented from publishing information about the criminal action involving banker Daniel Dantas and the companies Kroll, Brasil Telecom, Telecom Italia, as well as senior figures in the Lula government. The decision was made by judge André Custódio Nekatschalow, from the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region. He denied the request for an injunction in a Writ of Mandamus filed by Folha da Manhã Company to determine the immediate restitution of Folha's right to publish information about the case. There is an appeal. Nekatschalow understood that “there is no aggression against the right of the petitioner [Folha] that requires preliminary action”. The merits of the action must be judged by the 5th Panel of the TRF-3.
The information comes from reporter Frederico Vasconcelos, from the Folha de S.Paulo newspaper . In the request for a Writ of Mandamus, the newspaper contested the decision of judge Sílvio Luis Ferreira da Rocha, from the 5th Criminal Court of São Paulo, who ordered the removal from the internet of pages containing information about the Kroll case — espionage allegedly Belize Email List ordered by Daniel Dantas . Subsequently, the substitute judge, Margarete Sacristan, restricted the scope of the measure, prohibiting the disclosure of the content of telephone and telematic interceptions and bank and tax documents of the accused. For the judge, the attempt to prohibit the disclosure of the case aims “solely at the judicial secrecy of information that was the content of telephone and telematic interception, in addition to banking and tax elements”.
Custódio Nekatschalow also noted that “it does not seem unreasonable that journalistic activity should respect confidentiality”. According to him, “the court decision does not end censorship or 'white censorship', as stated in the initial petition”. According to the judge, it is a question of whether or not the secrecy of the records becomes effective. In other words, “the requested authority could remain inert and watch the disclosure of confidential information in the files. On the contrary, the authority chose to enforce, as far as possible, the primordial secrecy [the secrecy of seized documents and interceptions], urging the petitioner to respect it.
The information comes from reporter Frederico Vasconcelos, from the Folha de S.Paulo newspaper . In the request for a Writ of Mandamus, the newspaper contested the decision of judge Sílvio Luis Ferreira da Rocha, from the 5th Criminal Court of São Paulo, who ordered the removal from the internet of pages containing information about the Kroll case — espionage allegedly Belize Email List ordered by Daniel Dantas . Subsequently, the substitute judge, Margarete Sacristan, restricted the scope of the measure, prohibiting the disclosure of the content of telephone and telematic interceptions and bank and tax documents of the accused. For the judge, the attempt to prohibit the disclosure of the case aims “solely at the judicial secrecy of information that was the content of telephone and telematic interception, in addition to banking and tax elements”.
Custódio Nekatschalow also noted that “it does not seem unreasonable that journalistic activity should respect confidentiality”. According to him, “the court decision does not end censorship or 'white censorship', as stated in the initial petition”. According to the judge, it is a question of whether or not the secrecy of the records becomes effective. In other words, “the requested authority could remain inert and watch the disclosure of confidential information in the files. On the contrary, the authority chose to enforce, as far as possible, the primordial secrecy [the secrecy of seized documents and interceptions], urging the petitioner to respect it.